Volume: 25 Issue: 6, 12/31/21

Year: 2021

Research Articles

Davut AVCI SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 0000-0002-9011-6191
Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
Artificial Intelligence, Models and Simulations of Design, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Manufacturing and Service Systems
Water Quality and Water Pollution, Waste Management, Reduction, Reuse and Recycling, Environmental Pollution and Prevention, Environmentally Sustainable Engineering
Aysun EĞRİSÖĞÜT TİRYAKİ SAKARYA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
Mechatronics Engineering, Simulation, Modelling, and Programming of Mechatronics Systems, Automation Engineering, Control Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics (Other), Machine Theory and Dynamics
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ertan BOL SAKARYA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING 0000-0002-3903-0384
Engineering, Civil Geotechnical Engineering, Geological Sciences and Engineering, Applied Geology
Biological Sciences, Molecular Genetics, Genetics (Other)
Engineering Electromagnetics, Antennas and Propagation, Wireless Communication Systems and Technologies (Incl. Microwave and Millimetrewave)
Mehmet UYSAL SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 0000-0002-9396-7450
Mehmet NEBİOĞLU SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Chemical Sciences, Organic Chemistry
Information and Computing Sciences, Machine Vision , Big Data, Computer Software
Analytical Chemistry
Coding, Information Theory and Compression, Algebra and Number Theory
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ömer TAMER SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, FİZİK BÖLÜMÜ, FİZİK PR. 0000-0002-2241-789X
Physical Sciences, Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, Nonlinear Optics and Spectroscopy, Photonics, Optoelectronics and Optical Communications, Classical and Physical Optics, Condensed Matter Modelling and Density Functional Theory
Aliye Suna ERSES YAY SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Engineering
Prof. Dr. Aykut ASTAM Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fizik Bölümü
Material Physics, Structural Properties of Condensed Matter, Semiconductors
Prof. Dr. Burak ERKAYMAN ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, ENDÜSTRİ MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ
Decision Support and Group Support Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Models and Simulations of Design, Manufacturing Management, Stochastic (Probability ) Process, Manufacturing and Service Systems
Biological Sciences, Aquatic Toxicology , Histology and Embryology
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Caner ERDEN SAKARYA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES, FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY 0000-0002-7311-862X
Algorithms and Calculation Theory, Machine Learning, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Artificial Intelligence, Industrial Engineering, Optimization in Manufacturing
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Can Serkan KESKİN SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ 0000-0002-6045-3533
Analytical Chemistry, Analytical Spectrometry, Instrumental Methods
Elif BÜYÜK ÖĞÜT Kocaeli Üniversitesi
Chemical Sciences, Electrochemistry, Materials Science and Technologies, Material Characterization, Nanotechnology, Nanomaterials
Physical Sciences
Nuclear Physics
Information and Computing Sciences, Information Systems, Information Systems Philosophy, Research Methods and Theory, Information Systems Development Methodologies and Practice, Coding, Information Theory and Compression, Computer Forensics, Information Security and Cryptology, Data and Information Privacy, Recommender Systems, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Data Engineering and Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
Prof. Dr. Gülnur ARABACI SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Chemical Sciences, Biologically Active Molecules
İrfan YAZICI Sakarya Üniversitesi
Urban Design, Architectural Design, Project and Production Management
Chemical Sciences, Organic Chemical Synthesis
Energy, Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion, Materials Science and Technologies
Prof. Dr. Miraç ALAF BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ 0000-0002-4807-3909
Materials Science and Technologies, Materials Engineering, Plating Technology, Composite and Hybrid Materials, Metals and Alloy Materials, Nanomaterials
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Maruf ÖZTÜRK SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Reinforcement Learning, Computer Software
Mathematical Optimisation, Mathematical Logic, Set Theory, Lattices and Universal Algebra, Applied Mathematics (Other)
Chemical Sciences, Transition Metal Chemistry, Metal Organic Frameworks, Organometallic Chemistry, Polymer Science and Technologies
Prof. Dr. Murat UTKUCU SAKARYA UNIVERSITY
Earthquake Engineering
Mustafa AKPINAR Sakarya Üniversitesi
Cell Development, Proliferation and Death, Cell Metabolism, Structural Biology, Hydrobiology, Ecotoxicology, Animal Developmental and Reproductive Biology, Aquatic Toxicology , Veterinary Histology and Embryology
Osman KIRTEL Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi
Operator Algebras and Functional Analysis
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rıfkı TERZİOĞLU BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK-MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, ELEKTRİK-ELEKTRONİK MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ 0000-0001-6305-5349
Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Condensed Matter; Superconductivity, Power Plants
Prof. Dr. Sibel GÜNEŞ Erciyes Üniversitesi
Mechanical Engineering
Algebraic and Differential Geometry, Topology
Prof. Dr. Turgay ŞİŞMAN ATATURK UNIVERSITY
Animal Physiology-Ecophysiology, Toxicology, Histology and Embryology

SAUJS, Turkey and even across the globe, engineering and basic sciences will contribute to the scientific development of all disciplines in the field to increase scientific research, disseminate and aims to share with the public the academic studies of different disciplines.

The research topics or areas covered by SAUJS are listed below (Topics are not limited to these but generally consist of these):


Computer Engineering,

Cyber ​​Security,

Electrical-Electronics Engineering,

Biomedical Engineering,

Information Systems,

Mechanical and Energy,

Mechanical Design,

Mechatronics Engineering,

Automotive,

Fire & Disaster Management,

Industrial Engineering,

Quality Management,

Civil Engineering,

Geophysical Engineering,

Environmental Engineering,

Architecture,

Metallurgical and Materials Engineering,

Physics,

Chemistry,

Mathematics,

Biology,

Genetic Engineering,

Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,

Agricultural Engineering,

Food Engineering,

Industry 4.0

Online Submissions

Already have a Username/Password for Sakarya University Journal of Science?
Go to Login

Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

This guide applies to the majority of Sakarya University Journal of Science(SAUJS) Manuscripts submissions system. 

Author Guidelines

Before submission please check the SAUJS homepage for information SAUJS scope, available article types, specific manuscript length limits and details of any variations to the peer review process that might apply.

Please read author guidelines first. You can find more detail in our author guidelines which are presented in the style of a typical article, and offer suggestions on how to format a manuscript.

Download Template File (.dotx)


INTRODUCTION

This document has been adapted from earlier style guides used for the “Sakarya University Journal of Science (SAUJS)”. Please write you papers using this style guide. 

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Papers for this journal should be no longer than 20 pages, including references, appendices, figures, and tables. Tables and figures should be inserted directly into the manuscript, close to where they are referenced. Both tables and figures should be numbered sequentially from 1 to n. Do not re-start the numbering with each section in the paper. The paper should be written in Microsoft Word. We have observed that keeping papers on the shorter side usually improves the writing and makes the logic tighter, so we are maintaining a rather strict page limit. It is important that authors follow our instructions carefully. To help you in this task, we have written this document in the recommended format and the Word version includes the embedded styles. 

Page Limit

The full manuscript must not exceed 20 pages. It must include an abstract of up to 300 words. The 20 pages should include all tables, figures, and references. 

Quality of Your Document

Please be sure to check your document for spelling and grammar before submitting it electronically.

Margins

In the first page which includes Title and Abstract must be 5 cm from top, 2.5 cm from bottom, left and right. For the other pages, left and right margins must be 1.5 cm and others should be 2.5 cm, with text fully justified. This guideline is a sample file for all those requirements. You are encouraged to hyphenate words to obtain more even word spacing.

Spacing

The body text of the paper should be single-spaced and fully justified in 12 point Times New Roman font. Do not leave one-line space between paragraphs, and do not indent the first line of a new paragraph. 

Use one space after punctuation marks such as periods, commas, semi-colons, and colons. No space after internal periods in abbreviations (a.m., i.e., U.S.).

Do not insert one-line space between paragraphs. Use 12 pt. line after and before the all paragraphs.

Headings

For the main headings use 12 point Times New Roman bold font, all letters caps, centered. Use 12 pt. line before and 18 pt. line after the main headings. 

For Level 2 headings, use justified 12-point Times New Roman font and capitalize the first letter of the first word. Please use the MS Word font styles for the headings

Headers

Please do not put any header or footer in your paper. 

First Page Requirements

Title of the Article

Do not use a separate title page. For the article title, use 14-point Times New Roman bold font, only first letter caps, centered. 

Authors

Do not write down any information about authors at this stage. Author information will be required after your submission is accepted for publishing.

Abstract and Keywords

Use no more than 300 words in the abstract to indicate the nature of the topic and to briefly summarize the findings of the paper. Put “Keywords:” on the next cell, followed by no more than five keywords.  Keywords must be selected from Turkey Science Terms (http://www.bilimterimleri.co it).

The Body of the Paper

The body of the paper should be separated from the abstract by two-line spaces. The “body text” style used here is justified 12-point Times New Roman font. In body text, space no space after each period that ends a sentence. Do not leave a line space between paragraphs. Do NOT indent the first word of a new paragraph.

Footnotes, Figures, and Tables

Footnotes

Footnotes are generally discouraged but may be used when necessary. They should be numbered consecutively and placed at the bottom of the page on which they appear, separated from the body of the text by a line one inch long (or 10 spaces). Two footnotes on the same page should be separated by a line space. Be sure to observe the margin requirements at the bottom of the page. Footnotes should not be attached to equations.

Figures and Tables

Use a 11 pt Times New Roman font for figure and table captions. Figures and tables should appear soon after their first citation in the text and should be included in a manner that allows easy reference while reading the text. Please try to make them as legible as possible. 

Figure captions should be located below the figure, centered and not bolded with no period following the figure number or at the ends of the lines.

Table captions should be located above the table on two lines, not bolded, with the table number on the first line, the description on the next line, both lines left-justified and no periods at the end of the table number or the lines. Leave one blank line between the end of the caption and the table. 

For both table and figure captions, capitalize only the first letter of the first word unless a word is normally capitalized because it is a proper name. Do not use bold fonts. Do not use periods after the table and figure numbers, and no periods at the ends of the lines. Refer to all tables and figures nearby in the text.

Tables should be centered, if possible across the entire page, as shown in Table 1. The entries in the cells of the table should be left justified. The font used for the cell entries is left to the discretion of the author. In general tables look better and are easier to read if you minimize the number of vertical lines and use only horizontal lines so far as possible as shown in template file.

Citations

To format your references please use the IEEE Citation Reference: 

https://www.ieee.org/documents/ieeecitationref.pdf

Please left-justify your references and do not use the hanging indents preferred by the IEEE.  Books, journals, and other references should be cited in the main document text by a numerical order. 

Quotations

If a quotation contains two or more sentences and four or more lines, it should be set off from the body of the text with 1.5-inch left and right margins.

Formulas

All formulas should be placed on separate lines, justified, and numbered consecutively. Be certain that all symbols are adequately defined. Identification numbers should be placed in the right side of the formula.

Appendices

Appendices, if needed, should immediately follow the body of the paper and precede the references. Please use appendices sparingly. All tables and figures should be referred to in the text and located in the body of the paper, as near as possible to where they are referred to in the text.

Acknowledgments

If you wish to thank the referees, editors, or anyone who contributed to the study, then this thank you text should be written under the heading "Acknowledgments".

Funding

Please provide all the details requested by your funding and support organizations under the heading Funding as follows:
“This study is supported by Sakarya University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. Project Number: 2016-01-02-001.”
If no support was received, then, under this heading "The author (s) has no received any financial support for the research, authorship or publication of this study." statement should be written.

The Declaration of Conflict of Interest/ Common Interest

Authors should indicate in the cover letter any conflicts of interest that may arise from financial relationships, personal relationships or competition, academic competition, or differences in ideologies or beliefs. These conflicts can be personal, commercial, political, academic or financial. As the author, you must make a report if this is the case. For example,
"In accordance with the conflict of interest policy and my ethical obligation as a researcher, I inform you that ……… [firm, institution, person] may be affected by the research reported in the accompanying document. I have fully disclosed this conflict of interest situation to the journal and I have an approved plan to manage potential conflicts.” like.
If there is no conflict of interest or common interest, then, the following statement should be written:
“No conflict of interest or common interest has been declared by the authors”.


Authors' Contribution

Under this heading, "The authors contributed equally to the study" or "The first author contributed 60%, the second author 40%." expressions such as should be included.


The Declaration of Ethics Committee Approval

If the study requires the approval of the ethics committee, the name, date, and number of the board from which the consent was obtained should be specified under this heading. In addition, information about the permit should be included in the METHOD section. A copy of the permission obtained should be uploaded as ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE at the article submission stage.
If the study does not require ethics committee permission, the statement "This study does not require ethics committee permission or any special permission" should be included under this heading.
In addition, ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL IS NOT REQUIRED DECLARATION FORM must be signed by the responsible author and uploaded instead of the ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE to be requested at the article submission stage.


The Declaration of Research and Publication Ethics

The following statement should be included under this heading:
“The authors of the paper declare that they comply with the scientific, ethical and quotation rules of SAUJS in all processes of the paper and that they do not make any falsification on the data collected. In addition, they declare that Sakarya University Journal of Science and its editorial board have no responsibility for any ethical violations that may be encountered, and that this study has not been evaluated in any academic publication environment other than Sakarya University Journal of Science.”
In addition, the RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS DECLARATION FORM regarding this statement should be signed by the corresponding author and uploaded as an additional file when submitting the article.

REFERENCES

A sample references list is given below;

[1] T. Wei and B. Khoshnevis, “Integration of process planning and scheduling: a review,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 51–63, 2000.

[2] R. Meenakshi Sundaram and S. Fu, “Process planning and scheduling — A method of integration for productivity improvement,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1–4, pp. 296–301, 1988.

[3] Y. Chu, F. You, J. M. Wassick, and A. Agarwal, “Integrated planning and scheduling under production uncertainties: Bi-level model formulation and hybrid solution method,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 72, pp. 255–272, 2015.

[4] F. S. Chan, V. Kumar, and M. Tiwari, “Optimizing the Performance of an Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling Problem: An AIS-FLC based Approach,” 2006 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, pp. 1–8, 2006.

[5] W. Tan and B. Khoshnevis, “Integration of process planning and scheduling— a review,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51–63, 2000.

[6] D. Yip-Hoi and D. Dutta, “A genetic algorithm application for sequencing operations in process planning for parallel machining,” IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 1996.

[7] B. Yuan, C. Zhang, X. Shao, and Z. Jiang, “An effective hybrid honey bee mating optimization algorithm for balancing mixed-model two-sided assembly lines,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 53, no. 5–8, pp. 32–41, 2015.



Submission Preparation Checklist 

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

The File of the Manuscript

This file includes article title, abstract, keywords; main text input, material and method, results, discussion; thank; fund financing information, non-conflict statement; authors' contribution, ethics committee approval statement, research and publication ethics statement, references; should include attachments (if any) information. Author information should not be included in this file. Document properties should be anonymized (The person who wrote the document should not be known. For this, the Remove all options should be selected from the window that opens by saying File-Check For Problems-Examine Document in your word document.)

ORCID 

From 1 December 2017 all submitting authors will need to have an Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) identifier (iD) associated with their affiliation account.

ORCID is dedicated to solving the longstanding problem that author’s contributions can be hard to recognize in scholarly communication. This can be due to authors changing name or other authors having the same name. Providing the solution, ORCID has created a central registry of unique identifiers for individual researchers.

We encourage all authors and referees to register for a free ORCID iD or to associate your existing ORCID iD account when you update your account, submit your manuscript or referee an article in our submission and peer review system.

The benefits of having an ORCID iD are that:

  1. It uniquely identifies you and connects you to your publications:
  2. We can include your iD in your published manuscripts, and the publication lists in your ORCID record will then be automatically updated via Crossref (you will need to grant permission to Crossref in the first instance).
  3. You can enhance your ORCID record with your professional information and link to your other identifiers, such as Scopus, ResearcherID or LinkedIn.
  4. It may be included on your webpage, as well as when you submit publications, apply for grants and in any research workflow.
  5. If you referee for us and claim credit via Publons, your ORCID record can also be automatically updated (you will need to grant permission for this in the first instance).

Documents required to be uploaded in addition to the article file:

Copyright Notice 

We request that authors transfer (assign) the copyright in their articles to SAUJS before publication. This ensures that we have the right to work with, reproduce and to make your article available to readers. This is the case whether you have chosen to publish on a subscription-only or on a gold open access basis.

 
Ethics Committee Approval Certificate (Required at Article Submission Stage for Studies Requiring Ethics Committee Permission)

Ethics Committee Approval is not Required Declaration Form (Required at the Submission Stage of the Articles for Studies that Do not Require Ethics Committee Permission) -This form will be uploaded instead of the Ethics Committee Approval Document.

Research and Publication Ethics Declaration Form (Required at Article Submission Stage) -It will be uploaded as an additional file.

Authors' Contribution Form (Required at Article Submission Stage)

The Declaration of Conflict of Interest/Common Interest  (Required at Article Submission Stage)


Cover Letter - Required

Except for the Author Contribution Form and The Declaration of Conflict of Interest/Common Interest, the above forms must be uploaded by either all authors or signed only by the corresponding author. Author contribution form and The Declaration of Conflict of Interest/Common Interest and The Declaration of Conflict of Interest/Common Interest, must be signed by all authors.

ALL FORMS SHOULD BE WET SIGNED AND UPLOADED TO THE SYSTEM BY SCANNING.

It is sufficient to send only the English form among the forms written in both languages. Turkish forms are for informational purposes only.

NOTE: While submitting the article, all subheadings starting from the "Funding" title should be filled. Please provide this when submitting the article for the first time, not soon as the article is published.




ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
The following ethical duties and responsibilities are taken into consideration as open access guides and policies (such as "Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" and "COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors") published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) has been prepared.

AUTHORS ' DUTIES AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES

  • Articles submitted to the journal must be original and scientific work of the author (s). It is essential that the information created in a scientific study is new, proposes a new method or adds a new dimension to existing knowledge. The presented study should be a research article only.
  • If authors have used the works and / or statements of others, they should ensure that this is cited correctly and appropriately. The list of references should be complete. Plagiarism and fake data should not be included.
  • Publications that are effective in determining the quality of the study reported in the article should also be mentioned. Plagiarism takes many forms, from writing someone else's publication like the author's to copying (without attributing) important parts of someone else's work, or in other words, getting the result of research conducted by others. Any kind of plagiarism, fraudulent or deliberate misrepresentation constitutes unethical publishing behavior and cannot be accepted.
  • All studies submitted to SAUJS are checked for plagiarism by the journal secretary through the iThenticate program at the pre-check stage. The similarity rate in the plagiarism report created after the plagiarism check should be at most 30%. Articles with a similarity rate above this rate are directly rejected by the journal secretary.
  • Articles with a similarity rate of 30% or less are directed to the relevant editor after spelling and language control. Even if the similarity rate of the article is not over 30%, the editors may ask the authors to make corrections regarding the relevant parts of their work or remove the work from the publication process after the similarity report evaluation. For this reason, authors should not include all quotation paragraphs in their work.
  • If there is a suspicion of plagiarism in a published article, the editor in chief of SAUJS initiates the necessary investigation and sends the situation to the indexes where the journal is scanned together with the relevant institutions and authorities.
  • All responsibility of the work belongs to the authors. Studies should be prepared in accordance with the international scientific ethical rules, which we have mentioned on this page. Under the heading "Research and Publication Ethics Statement" before bibliography in all submitted articles, the statement

    "The author(s) of the article declare that they comply with the scientific, ethical and quotation rules of SAUJS in all processes of the article and that they do not make any falsification on the data collected. In addition, they (he/she) declare(s) that Sakarya University Journal of Science and its editorial board have no responsibility for any ethical violations that may be encountered, and that this study has not been evaluated in any academic publication environment other than Sakarya University Journal of Science."

    should be included.
  • In addition, for the above mentioned Research and Publication Ethics Statement, the RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS DECLARATION FORM  signed by the responsible author should be uploaded as an additional file at the submission stage.
  • ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL must be obtained for research in all disciplines and for clinical and experimental studies, human and animal studies that require an ethical committee decision, THIS APPROVAL MUST BE SPECIFIED AND CERTIFIED IN THE ARTICLE.
    In studies requiring ethics committee approval, information about the permission (name of the board, date and number) should be included in the method section and also on the first / last page of the article.

Studies Requiring Ethics Committee Permission

  1. All kinds of research conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from participants using questionnaires, interviews, focus group work, observation, experimentation, interview techniques.
  2. Research using humans and animals (including material / data) for experimental or other scientific purposes.
  3. Research on animals
  4. Retrospective studies in accordance with the law on the use of personal data


STATUS OF STUDIES THAT DO NOT REQUIRE ETHICS COMMITTEE PERMISSION

If the study does not require the permission of the ethics committee, instead of the ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE, which will be requested from the authors at the time of article submission, the "Ethics Committee Approval Is Not Required Declaration Form" should be uploaded signed by the responsible author. This statement should be written at the end of the article under the heading "Ethics Committee Approval".
  • Studies should not be published in another journal or submitted to another journal for printing. For this, a cover letter explaining this situation is requested from the authors.
  • When submitting the article to our journal, authors must sign the "COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM" and upload it through the system. All authors must sign this form, or only the RESPONSIBLE AUTHOR must sign on behalf of all authors.
  • Authors are expected to carefully consider the list and order of authors before submitting their articles, and to present the exact list of authors at the time of original submission. Adding or removing author names from the author list should only be done before article submission. In addition, the submission of the article to the journal should be made by the responsible author, and the information (author name, e-mail address, orcid information, etc.) of all authors of the article should be added to the system during the article submission phase. Submissions that do not comply with this rule will be rejected by our journal secretary.
  • Those who have not contributed to the article should not be stated as the article author. Relevant authors must have participated in the submitted work individually and should take all responsibility for this work.
  • Contribution rates of all the authors of the article to the article process should be stated under the heading "Authors' Contributions" before the bibliography at the end of the article (This statement will be stated in the latest revision file to be sent to the layout editor after the acceptance of the article, as the referees should not know the names of the authors due to the principle of blind review.)
  • All authors must see and approve the final version of the submitted article before submission.
  • The text, figures, tables and documents contained in the article must not violate the copyrights of other persons.
  • Authors should not arbitrarily withdraw the article while the peer review process continues on the submitted article. If they want to withdraw, they can withdraw by obtaining approval by sending a letter to the SAUJS editor-in-chief with the required explanation.
  • Authors are encouraged to write a thank you text at the end of the article, after the article is accepted, thanking the person (s), or institutions, who supported the process of the article. The thank you text written to the people should be under the title of ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. The text of acknowledgment to the institutions from which Fund-Funding has been received should be written under the title of FUNDING (For example, "This study was supported by the [Fund Agency] under the Grant [Fund Number].")
  • If there are conflicts of interest (or common interest) regarding the submitted article, the reason should be stated in the cover letter. If no conflict of interest is declared, the statement “No potential conflict of interest has been declared by the authors” will be added to the end of the article while the article is being prepared for publication.
  • When an author notices a material error or mistake in his or her published work, he should immediately notify the editor or publisher of the journal and cooperate with the editor to correct the article.
  • Raw data can be requested from the authors regarding their articles during the evaluation process. In such a case, authors should be present to present the expected information and documents.

DUTIES AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD

  • It is the editor's responsibility to decide which of the articles submitted to the journal will be published. The editor will review articles regardless of the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy. The decision will be based on the article's importance, originality, clarity, validity of the study, and relevance to the journal's scope. They should take care that the study contributes to readers, researchers and practitioners. Current legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism should also be considered. Editors should not show any privileges to the authors of the articles submitted to the journal and should fulfill their duties in a balanced, objective and fair manner.
  • The editor should not reveal any information about a submitted article to anyone other than the relevant author, referees, potential referees and publisher.
  • Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript will not be used by the editor or editorial board for their own research purposes without the express written permission of the author.
  • Editors should strive to continuously improve SAUJS and increase the quality of the publication.
  • They are responsible for the determination and implementation of all policies of the journal.
  • During the evaluation of the studies, they should not bring together people with whom there might be a relationship. Editors who make the final decision about the articles are expected to have no personal, professional or financial ties with the authors of the study.
  • They should include the support or sponsored work in the evaluation process in the same way as any other study.
  • If the study is not prepared in line with the journal's purpose and scope, they should reject the study directly.
  • They should take the necessary measures to prevent possible conflicts of interest and evaluate the existing statements, if any.
  • They should apply the necessary sanctions in case of ethical violations related to the study.
  • During the evaluation process, they must appoint an arbitrator according to the blind arbitration principle and respect the principle of confidentiality.
  • In order to evaluate the studies objectively, editors should act by checking the appropriateness of the referees' field of expertise and the subject of the study, not according to the relationship of interest when determining the referees.
  • Editors should work on the continuous updating and expansion of the referee pool.
  • When publishing issues in the journal, they should include not only articles in certain fields, but also a wide range of articles in every field within the scope of the journal.
  • They must ensure the protection of personal data in articles reviewed; they must protect individual data of authors, referees and readers.
  • They should take necessary precautions against people who abuse their job.
  • Editors should provide as much feedback as possible to authors 'or referees' questions about the process. They should also be open to negative criticism.
  • Editors should check the submission files, make a referee assignment after making sure that the files except the article file are complete. It should be checked whether the author has uploaded all the additional statements requested by the journal, signed.
  • In all processes of the articles, they should act according to the rules of the journal's publication process.
DUTIES AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE REFEREES
All research articles submitted to SAUJS are evaluated according to the double-blind peer-review principle. Referees are expected to fill in a referee evaluation form that includes their contribution to the fields under the scope of the journal, their views on whether the article is worth publishing, and their justification for these views. In this process, referees are required to pay attention to the following ethical responsibilities and make their evaluations accordingly.
  • To contribute to the editor's decision-making process by examining the work sent to them for evaluation, objectively and objectively (regardless of religion, language, race, gender, political opinion, economic interest) within the given time.
  • To accept the evaluation of only studies related to the field of expertise
  • To provide constructive and developing suggestions to increase the quality of the study it evaluates.
  • In accordance with the principle of confidentiality, they should destroy the study after the evaluation process, but if they want to use the study after it is published, they should use it.
  • When referees understand that there is a conflict of interest or a common interest, they should decline to review the article and inform the editor of this. Reviewers should not consider articles that contain conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or link with any author, company or institution associated with the articles.
  • They should make the assessment in a constructive and courteous language. They should not make derogatory personal comments (especially on articles that are rejected) that contain hostility, slander, and libel.
  • All articles received for review should be treated as confidential documents. It should not be discussed or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.
  • Reviewers should identify cases where the relevant published work cited in the article is not cited in the reference section. They should indicate whether observations or arguments from other publications accompany the relevant source. Referees will inform the editor about significant similarities or overlaps between the reviewed article and other published articles for which they have personal information.

It is recommended to take into account the following information taken from YÖK Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive.


Actions contrary to scientific research and publication ethics are:
a) Plagiarism: To show others' original ideas, methods, data or works as their own work, partially or completely, without reference to scientific rules,

b) Fraud: Using data that does not actually exist or has been falsified in scientific research,

c) Distortion: Falsifying the research records or the data obtained, showing the devices or materials not used in the research as being used, falsifying or shaping the results of the research in line with the interests of the people and organizations,

ç) Republishing: To present repetitive publications as separate publications for academic appointments and promotions

d) Slicing: Dividing the results of a research into pieces in a way that disrupts the integrity of the research and inappropriately and publishing in more than one issue and presenting these publications as separate publications in academic appointments and promotions,

e) Unfair authorship: Including people who do not have active contribution among the authors or not including those who are, changing the author's order in an unjustified and inappropriate manner, removing the names of those who have active contribution from the work in subsequent editions, including their names among the authors by using their influence even though they have no active contribution,

Other types of ethical violations include:

a) Not specifying the supporting persons, institutions or organizations and their contributions in the publications made as a result of researches conducted with the support,

b) To use the thesis or studies that have not yet been submitted or accepted as a source without the permission of the owner,

c) Not complying with ethical rules in researches on humans and animals, not respecting patients' rights in publications,

ç) To act contrary to the provisions of the relevant legislation in biomedical researches and other clinical trials related to humans,

d) Sharing the information contained in a work that has been assigned to review with others before it is published without the explicit permission of the owner of the study.

e) Misuse of the resources, places, facilities and devices provided or allocated for scientific research,

f) To claim unfounded, unwarranted and deliberate ethical violations,

g) To publish the data obtained without the express consent of the participants in a questionnaire and attitude research conducted within the scope of a scientific study or if the research is to be conducted in an institution, also without the permission of the institution,

h) To harm animal health and ecological balance in research and experiments,

ı) Failing to obtain written permission from the authorized units in research and experiments before starting the work.

i) Research and experiments in legislation or engage in activities contrary to the provisions on related research and experimentation of the international conventions that Turkey is a party.

j) Failing to comply with the obligation to inform and warn those concerned about possible harmful practices regarding the scientific research conducted by researchers and authorities,

k) Not using the data and information obtained from other persons and institutions in scientific studies, to the extent and as permitted, not to respect the confidentiality of this information and to ensure its protection,

l) To make false or misleading statements regarding scientific research and publications in academic appointments and promotions,

Situations That Will Not Be Considered Inconsistent With Scientific Research And Publication Ethics
The use of anonymous information, basic knowledge of science fields, mathematical theorems and propositions in studies cannot be considered as an ethical violation, provided that they do not use someone else's original style and expression exactly.

PUBLICATION POLICY
PUBLICATION LANGUAGE
SAUJS only reviews research articles written in English.

PUBLICATION FREQUENCY
In SAUJS, which has been publishing issues since 1997, a volume has been published every year since 2017 and each volume consists of 6 issues (February, April, June, August, October, December).

OPEN ACCESS POLICY
SAUJS is an Open Access journal that aims to ensure the visibility of scientific studies by the public and to increase their impact, and is aware of the need for information to be easily accessible in order to improve science and strengthen the scientific communication network.

WAGE POLICY
SAUJS does not charge the author / authors at any stage (submission, evaluation and publication of articles) for publication procedures.

JOURNAL PUBLICATION PROCESS

• PRE-EVALUATION PROCESS
Articles submitted to SAUJS primarily fall into the journal secretary's system. The journal secretary checks whether the files required for article submission are fully uploaded to the system by the author and whether the file names are appropriate. Also, it creates the similarity report of the article and uploads it to the system. If there are deficiencies or errors in the files or if the similarity rate of the article is over 30%, the article is sent again to the author to make the necessary updates.

If the similarity rate is appropriate and there is no problem in the files, the article is sent to the Spelling and Language Editor after this step. The Spelling and Language editor is responsible for checking the suitability of the article to the article writing template of the journal and the writing language. If the Spelling and Language Editor has a positive opinion after checking it, it sends the article to the Statistical Editor in order to evaluate the article statistically. (If there is a problem in the writing style or language of the article, the article is sent again to the author to make a correction.) After making the evaluation, the statistical editor directs the article to the editor related to the field of the article. From here on, the status of the article appears as IN EDITOR. So the article has been pre-checked.

While in the secretary step, the maximum time given to the secretary for article control is 10 days. During this time, the status of the article appears as IN SECRETARY. When the article is sent again to the author, the status of the article will be RESUBMISSION REQUESTED and the author is given 1 week to respond to this request. The author accepting the request is given 15 days to resubmit the article. During this period, the status of the article will appear as UNDER RESUBMISSION (WITH AUTHOR). The additional time to be given to authors who do not return within the specified periods is 5 days. The maximum period that can be given to the Copy editor or Statistics editor is 15 days.

The editor checks whether the article is scientifically sufficient, whether it is a study prepared in line with the purpose and scope of the journal, and its originality value, taking into account the similarity report of the article sent to it. After this check, if he / she has a positive opinion, the IN REVİEW step begins. (If he has a negative opinion, he / she rejects the article without taking it into the referee process.) The editor can also appoint a section editor to perform all these checks, if necessary.

The maximum time required for the editor to take over the article (Checked Step) is 10 days. The maximum time (Step  with Editor) required for the editor to continue processing after taking the article is 10 days.

EVALUATION PROCESS (REFEREE PROCESS)

The editor of the article or the section editor assigned by it, after receiving the article, sends an invitation to at least two referees related to the subject of the article to examine the article.The response period of the referee to the invitation sent for evaluation (accepting or rejecting the evaluation of the article) is 7 days. During this time, the status of the article will appear as "Reviewer Invited".The article evaluation form is automatically sent to the referee who accepted the invitation. (In this process, the status of the article appears as "Under Review".) 
The review period for the article is 15 days. 5 days additional time is given to the referees who do not return within the specified periods.The following principle is taken into consideration in the referee process.

Double-blind Refereeing Principle

SAUJS works on the principle of double blind arbitration. This means that the author (s) of the article will not know the identities of the referees who will evaluate the article, and the referees will not know the identity of the author (s). The aim here is to have an unbiased assessment.

In order to serve this purpose, authors should prepare an article file without giving their identities.They should remove identifying information, including author names, from filenames. In addition, document properties must be anonymized. To do this, from the FILE menu in the Microsoft Word , select CHECK PROBLEMS-REVIEW DOCUMENT-CHECK DOCUMENT INSPECTOR-CHECK and remove all information that may evoke the identity of the author. Attention should also be paid to the citations made within the article in order to hide the author (s) of the presented study.. For example, when the authors refer to their own works, instead of saying "…… in our study in [5]", they should use the expression. "in [5] ……." . Author and institution information should not be included in the visuals in the article.Headers and footers should not contain personal information.When working according to this system, discrimination that may arise from the demographic characteristics or gender of the author is minimized. No pressure is placed on the author of the article or the referee reviewing the article. 

Referees who accept the evaluation access the article file through the system (in this process, the referee cannot see the names of the article authors on the system) Examines the article within 15 days and uploads the completed referee evaluation form to the system.

The number of referee reviews required for the decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of the article is determined by the editor of the article.T he status of the article that has the desired number of referee evaluation forms appears as READY FOR  DECISION. The time given for processing in this step is 7 days. The maximum period given for the editor to make a decision (DECISION PENDING) is 7 days.

The editor has to make a decision in this process in line with the referee reports.It can also add additional opinion. The referee notifies the reports and suggestions to the author in a decision letter.With this letter, the article can be accepted or rejected. The editor may request a revision from the author, if he wishes. The period that can be given to the author to respond to the revision request is 7 days.The period given to the author who accepts the revision request is 15 days. (In this process, the status of the article appears as WITH AUTHOR.) After all these steps, accepted articles are transferred to the publishing process.

PUBLICATION PREPARATION PROCESS

It is the process in which accepted articles are prepared for publication in the relevant issue. During this period, the status of the article appears as "In Production".  In this process, publishing editor, layout editor and final reader are involved.The layout editor is responsible for making the article ready for publication as a shape (page layout, placement of tables and images in the article, the layout of the references, giving the page numbers according to the priority of the article acceptance date, placing the publisher's logo on the article).  The article whose layout has been completed is sent to the Proofreader for a final review of the article in terms of grammar, spelling rules and semantic integrity, and to identify possible spelling errors. After completing the last reader process, the journal publishing editor presents the final version of the article to be published in the relevant issue on the magazine web page in EARLY VIEW for the author to see.During this process, minor errors that may be present in the article are detected and there is still time to correct them. If the author detects any errors in this process, he should notify the technical communication officer of the journal by mail. The editorial editor receiving information from technical communication will make the necessary corrections. Articles can wait up to 15 days in EARLY VIEW. It is then published in the relevant issue. There is a possibility of correcting potential errors ONLY 5 DAYS after the issue is published. However, authors are expected to report their suggestions for correction while the article is in EARLY VIEW.

The periods stated above may be longer depending on the editors' intensity. It is recommended that you contact SAUJS-Technical Communication for any questions regarding the process.

Article submission/processing is free of charge.